Reviews and Ratings

Hmm  
1.0
   
written over 15 years ago

So, any release or source code yet? To be honest, I think this project just lowers the signal/noise ratio here around, as long there is no code + "I wanted to try my hand at raytracing. I know java. Here ya go." doesn't sound like something relevant. This is no portfolio website.

edit: Okay, after some digging I found the sources, but what I found was nothing more than a toy ray tracer that every programmer seems to write some day.

2 out of 2 users found the following review helpful.
Did this review help you? |
Why is this here?  
1.0
   
written almost 16 years ago

This is not worth the webspace it occupies. The program is about 1k LOC, plus 10k LOC (!) of Autoconf. Implement some features, like a custom degree of obfuscence, ASCII art, and so. But even then, there are enough alternatives, and writing a ascii/ansi/utf8/whatever-to-leet compiler takes any programmer not more than a few minutes, plus the gtk-effort.

And there is not even "support" for an 'ck' = 'XX', like in HaXXer.

A good laugh everyday. But not this one, I bet the developer himself has added the five-star to the Rating. Poor.

2 out of 4 users found the following review helpful.
Did this review help you? |
KISS  
5.0
 
written almost 16 years ago

Cervisia keeps it small and simple. It does no more or less than you need to do your daily commit. Every action has it's own shortcut, so even mass commits where you have to diff/describe/commit for every single file becomes as easy as declaring an integer.

While I am a GNOME user, from time to time I use Konqueror, and Cervisia integrates seamlessly into that fine Eierlegende Wollmilchsau.

Did this review help you? |